English isnt sexist essay

We act into the future, she explains, but cannot predict the result of our actions. There is an almost infinite number of variables involved.

English isnt sexist essay

An investigation into sexist language An Investigation into Sexist Language. One of the most important political and social movements of the twentieth century has been the drive towards achieving complete equality for all people regardless of race, colour, class, gender identity, mental state or physical impairment.

One area that has remained resistant to change is language. Some claim that the use of "politically correct" terms is not only unnecessary but disempowering Jernigan because it forces a group of people to refer to themselves by a term that was invented by people who are not of their group.

This essay will examine some of the different kinds of linguistic sexism in the English language, some of the reasons why these forms of language English isnt sexist essay harmful and finally some ideas of how these forms of language can be changed for the better.

As stated above the most obvious example of sexist language is the use of the male pronoun to describe groups of people containing both males and females. For example in the statement "if a child wants to buy some chocolate then he will need some money" the ungendered term "child" is replaced with the gendered pronoun "he" in the latter half of the sentence.

On a very basic level this is clearly simply inaccurate since roughly half of the children in the world are female. However the consequences of such usages might go well beyond a simple inaccuracy of language.

What this suggests is that not only are male pronouns used as generics, as would be expected, but also that writers tend to write about males more often than females. It is not far-fetched at all to suppose that part of the reason for this phenomenon is the prominence of the male pronoun.

Once again this is a very obvious objection but the repercussions are larger than one would think. Thorne et al points out another kind of linguistic sexism that more even clearly demonstrates the social disempowerment of women in the English language.

This is the tendency to refer to women in terms of their relations to men. Deborah Cameron found an even more extreme example of this form of sexism in an article written for the Sun newspaper. The article speaks of how "a terrified stone husband was forced to lie next his wife as two men raped her" Cameron Here the crime seems to exist only from the perspective of the husband.

The rape that was committed against his wife is only a crime because he was forced to endure it. As if she were a valuable possession that was being damaged before his eyes. It is quite obvious that inequalities do exist in the English language. But some remain unconvinced that this is really a bad thing.

There are many arguments as to why linguistic sexism is bad. In this sense what is important about sexist language is that people are genuinely hurt by the usage of sexist terms and society should attempt to change in order to make them feel better.

English isnt sexist essay

Neither of those two arguments is particularly compelling. The problem with these two views of the nature of linguistic sexism is that both of them unknowingly imply that the problem could be solved far more easily by simply returning women to the state of ignorance that they experienced in centuries past.

However it does serve to illustrate that there is an important aspect of sexist language that is being ignored by Escala and Valian and others who think as they do. Quite simply put they are ignoring the power relations implicit in the language use and their consequences.

Unfortunately an examination of the realities of legal distinctions between men and women has shown this to simply be false. Clearly social realities play a very important role. The social reality is that the problem with pronouns is much deeper than merely that of the male pronouns being used exclusively.

A study performed in Finegan and Besnier discovered that the female pronouns were actually being used in ambiguous situations but only with regards to roles that had low social status. For example doctors, lawyers and politicians were generally given the male pronoun whereas secretaries, nurses and teachers were generally given the female pronoun.

In light of this it becomes clear that the relationship between linguistic inequality and social reality is very real and very close.

There is clearly a link between language and reality but the question of the nature of this relationship remains.

Fasold in Pauwels claimed that the relationship between language and reality is that language merely reflects the reality. In other words sexist language exists because of the sexist nature of society and thus changing the language will serve only to mask the underlying inequalities in the society.

Whorf in Pauwels believes that the exact opposite is true: Societal reality is directly created by the nature of the language with the society. According to this view as soon as the language is changed it will immediately begin to metamorphose the society into one that more accurately reflects the language.

A far more compelling point of view is that while there is an interaction between the social and the linguistic this interaction his bi-directional and dynamic.On Taming Shrews Who Is the Misogynist Monster: Petruchio, Shakespeare, or You?

Is English a sexist language? | Antimoon Forum

Every year we seem to see one Shakespeare play in bunches, and this year it was the time of The Taming of the ashio-midori.com it, came all the post-feminist consternation about the play’s alleged sexist tone.

use the following search parameters to narrow your results: subreddit:subreddit find submissions in "subreddit" author:username find submissions by "username" site:ashio-midori.com fin.

Aug 25,  · That English words such as "surgeon" specify neither male nor female actually supports the argument that English is *not* sexist. If there were a male and female form of the word, then one would have to choose which form to use in a statement such as "Have you selected a surgeon?".

Aug 25,  · That English words such as "surgeon" specify neither male nor female actually supports the argument that English is *not* sexist. If there were a male and female form of the word, then one would have to choose which form to use in a statement such as "Have you selected a surgeon?".

sexism essaysSexism, set of attitudes and behaviors towards people that judge or belittle them in the basis of their gender, or that perpetuate stereotypical assumptions about gender roles.

Nowadays, the term is most often used to refer to men's attitude towards women. Traditionally, rights t. Against the Theory of "Sexist Language," Note 3 An English teacher at my own college told me once in all seriousness that the " -'s " ending that makes a noun possessive, e.g.

"Charlotte's Web," was an abbreviation of the pronoun "his," and that "his" was used in this way because women were all possessions of men.

Is the English Language sexist? (Essay) • Young Writers Society